{
"post": {
"title": "Helldivers 2 - share your specs and performance",
"selftext": "I am just curious how well the game runs and if anyone shares my specs to judge the performance, so please share away",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Helldivers/comments/1alslo3/helldivers_2_share_your_specs_and_performance/"
},
"comments": [
{
"body": "RTX4090, 7800X3D, 64G RAM@6000CL30\n\nMonitor is 1440P@170Hz\n\nThe setting is max out everything, native, no upscaler\n\nFPS is from 135-170FPS\n\nSo far, it is the most demanding online game I have ever played",
"replies": [
{
"body": "You just wanted to brag, and I celebrate that you did.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "If I want to brag, I will not say I use a 7800X3D.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "7800x3d is currently best gaming CPU",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Don't know what else you would brag with. Even the 14900k is toe to toe at best,",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Bragging has nothing to do with real gaming performance. I will brag if I have a Threadripper 7980X for gaming, even though I know it's gaming performance sucks.",
"replies": [
{
"body": ">even though I know it's gaming performance sucks\n\nYou know it huh? I suspect *you'd* not even be able to tell the difference.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "oh! oh! me too!\n\n4090 / 13900KS / EVGA Dark K|ngP|n / 48GB DDR5 8267Mhz",
"replies": [
{
"body": "yo feliz en mi intel i5 de 10 gen y mi gtx 1650 , aveces quiere explotar pero funciona"
}
]
}
]
},
{}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "Exact same setup, on online with 4 players and alot of Monsters on screen it goes to 90s. 170 fps you only really see on the ship",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I can confirm, exact same setup, easy combat 100-120fps, hard combat sometimes low 80fps, ship locked to 144fps"
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Which is crazy because it doesn't look anything special and there are barely any mobs on the map. Which doesn't make any sense as to why this game is super demanding. VR should be more demanding than this game, but even when I play VR it isn't. It's bonkers."
},
{
"body": "I've got almost this exact same setup except I've got a 7900 series CPU.\n\nHowever, my frame rates don't achieve the 164 hz refresh of my 1440p monitor. \n\nThis game throttles its performance. Somehow. Neither my CPU nor my GPU are being fully utilized.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "rtx 3060\n\namd ryzen 7 400\n\nits running badly like 30 fps, and drops even worse a lot of times. I searched on internet and ppl with worst gpu than mine has more perfomance. dont know what could be",
"replies": [
{
"body": "are u running single channel ram? try medium preset with the upscaler set to quality or balanced"
},
{
"body": "rtx 3060 and i5 12400 and i have the same problem :(",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I solved it by disabling the integrated gpu of my processor in the BIOS.\n\nalthough the game mentions that it uses the nvidia gpu, the game was using the integrated one.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "How much fps are you getting while in a full squad? Im running 40-60 fps on low with an RTX 3060 and a ryzen 5 5600x",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I was thinking on going to a Ryzen 7 5600x as I'm on the 7 2700x with a 4060 1080p... If your running 40-60 FPS and I'm doing 30-50 then...what 😂",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{}
]
}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "I have same specs as you and the game is running terribly for me as well. Dm me if you can."
},
{
"body": "Do you have everything on high settings? Maybe even 1440p? It's a pretty demanding game, whenever people do fps tests they usually show their setting try to match theirs"
},
{
"body": "I have a similar GPU (RTX A2000), and I fine tuned perfomance manually to have a nearly constant 60fps.... I launched Geforce Experience a bit later to see that it matches the optimal performance for the game. Try that if you're ok with trading a bit of visual quality for performance.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i7 12700f, rtx 3070, enough ram @1440p\n\nSettings medium-high with the upscaler set to ultra.\n\nSolid 80 dropping to 65 while the screen is full of non democratic bugs being cleansed by the glory of Super Earth",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Could you share your settings with me? I have nearly identical specs and experience avg fps in the 50’s with dips down to 40’s during large swarms, I feel like I should be getting better performance than I am.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Just switched everything to medium, but reflections and clouds to low so i can play on native. It never dips under 60. Trysetting the graphics profile to medium first. There are games that have settings that are changed only by the preset",
"replies": [
{}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "Medium to high with those specs? Mine are much worse and I run on high at an avg of like 80fps\n\nRx6600 and i7 6700k and 32gb of ram"
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Wow, this comments are reaaaally humbling. Was checking to see if someone had shared some meh pc specs to see if i could run it decently with 4 GB VRAM but hey everyone is above 3000 series so imma go cry in the shower.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "ran it on a rx 570, all low settings and ultra quality resolution 1080p and got around 30-40 fps. since switched to a 3070 tho",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "I mean, the Steam Deck handles the game on low settings pretty well. The games optimization is just kinda bad in general, so the performance gap between many lower end and higher end setups isn't that wide. Just because many higher-end setups don't perform too well doesn't mean it won't run playably on lower-end setups on this particular title."
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "1660super\n\ni5 10400F\n\n18Gb ram\n\n1080p\n\ngetting around 70-60 fps playing solo on ultra quality sampling, graphics low. \nWhen killing bus the game looks very pixelated and bad. So considering refunding tbh",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Change to native res",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Hold on I have a 1660 super and an i5 11400 but I’m only getting like 30 fps on medium or high settings which often dips down to the 20s",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I have 1660 super and i get 50fps stable on medium settings, what is your resolution upscale setting?",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I'm running the same specs as the one above but with Ryzen 2600 and I generally play at 40 FPS even when I'm just running around the map with no bugs with everything set to Low (and Performance on the upscaling).\n\nI've seen a few YouTube videos where they're getting 70fps on a 1660S and after reading your comment I'm pretty sure I should be getting better FPS. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I have the same cpu, with a 3060ti, and having the same performance. Even made a post today showing that i have the same performance with the game on low and ultra. Also don't know what's wrong, let me know if you find out",
"replies": [
{
"body": "There's nothing wrong - you're being limited by your CPU. This game is very cpu heavy."
},
{}
]
}
]
}
]
},
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i5-14600KF 4070 TI Super 16GB on 32gb Ram\n\nUltra with stable 80-90 fps\n\nRunning an ultrawide screen on 1440p\n\nCPU is wildly hot.. peaking at 90s at times",
"replies": [
{
"body": "same here. def most cpu demanding game ive seen."
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "7800x3d\n\n4080S\n\n32gb ram \n\nRunning it at 4k and I'm averaging 80-90 FPS \n\nTemps seem to stay steady around 60-65 on both the CPU and GPU.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Running same but at 1440p UW. My GPU only at like 80-90% utilization. You getting that?",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Sorry I missed this the other day! \n\nI'm usually hitting 90-95% GPU utilization. \n\nI'm running everything maxed out, but I don't think the game is optimized very well. With that said though, they do have a metric shit ton of stuff happening on screen during a major fire fight.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "All good. When I turn on supersampling I get full GPU utilization, but my fps goes down to 50-60 in game. On native resolution GPU at 80% and frames and 100ish. I dunno. Gsync helps tho so it looks fine at that setting"
}
]
},
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "[deleted]",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 7800x3d, Asus Tuf 7900XTX, 32gig G.Skill Neo@6000cl30\n\nOdyssey G9 Oled\n\nSettings Max on Native. Tried Ultra Super Sampling and crashed the game\n\n60-67 degrees, with hotspot about low 80's\n\n3-4 players in game, finished up with only 3\n\nLogged FPS on Adrenaline around 125-135 fps\n\n​\n\nhttps://preview.redd.it/jotl4u0sphkc1.png?width=2499&format=png&auto=webp&s=1d18b50297a189730005b1e7969461ef6510d307",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Full AMD build, I respect it. You're getting about 10 fps more than I am compared to my 4070 and 14900k, so definitely, the xtx is no joke even if it's a minor difference.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "There's a fall off with performance, because the XTX should be running rings around the 4070.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Well, the crashing and performance fall off is because its an AMD card lol.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Yeah no, a 4090 doesn't get that much better performance either. AMD cards are absolutely fine and I think you should drink less of the nVidia kool aid.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "They are fine in theory and for most games, but sadly it seems like you can expect the average AA game to favor nvidia cards"
},
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{}
]
}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "12700k + 4090, averaging 125 fps playing at 4K. My memory was at 6400 and I was getting so many crashes. Lowered to 5600 and crashes were reduced. Memory speed hasn’t been a problem for other games though.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "RTX 3060, Ryzen 5 2600\n1080p \n\nGetting like low 50s fps on mostly med settings. Could it be my CPU? Ive seen other folks run it with older gpus and seeing better fps than me :(",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Likely CPU but if not, try using --use-d3d11 in steam launch settings, I have 3060ti 12400f and using DX11 massively improved my experience\n\n[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6rM1h9O2Rw&t=3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6rM1h9O2Rw&t=3s) \nVideo talks about good and bad but I only notice good during my games"
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "I know this is a kinda old post but I have slightly below the minimum requirement specs and have been able to run the game perfectly fine for like 3-4 days now, playing it a decent bit.\n\nI have a gtx 1070 and intel i7700 \n\nyou can see full specs here for my exact pc:\n\nhttps://support.hp.com/ph-en/document/c05531225\n\nAll my settings are medium or lower, render distance is high, every extra feature is turned off apart from ambient occlusion (idk if i keep this yet), and the resolution is 1440p on a 144hz monitor.\n\nMy FPS is consistently above 30, averages around 40 throughout a match. Outside of matches or when there isnt much going on it will be 50 and during the most action it will be like 35 or a bit under.\n\nIn my opinion this is more than I would have expected based on my specs, especially having render distance be high.\n\nI hope I am not frying my CPU."
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 9 5900 HS, RTX 3060. 27 fps average, slideshow when too much democracy",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Has your performance improved since you wrote this comment? Did you check your GPU&CPU temperatures and power consumption?\n\nIm asking because I have a 5800h/ 3060 notebook and achieve 40-60 fps in 4k with settings between low-high. You definitely should be able to get more performance out of your machine.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i have an asus g14 laptop with the same specs,wanted to know if your performance improved and if yes, what is the average now and how did you do it",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "5950x, rtx 4090, 3440x1440\n\neverything max getting 120-150",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "RTX 3060ti, Ryzen 5 3600, 16gb ram @1080p\n\n\nHigh texture with basically medium to low on everything else. Anti Aliasing on. Supersampling enabled to counter the blurryness of 1080p. \n\n\nGetting around 90 in ship and maybe 70-80 on the gound? Pretty solid. \n\n\nNote that I am not running on latest nvidia driver as my c-drive is old and stuffed so I need to buy a bigger one to update it lol.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "r9 5950x rx 6950xt 32 gb ram no matter which settings i use when many bugs are on screen i get about 30-50fps but if i play on a lower difficulty with not that many bugs around i get around 60-90 fps on all maxed",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "So this game seems to be a bit wonky with settings and cpus apparently. My main system is a 5600x3d with 3600 32gb ram and a 6950xt and I was getting low 60s in fps while in game but I switched the cpu to an older 3700x with the same settings and now I'm getting 70s and high 60s. Idfk what the deal is\nEdit- forgot to mention running at 1440p res",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "2060 rtx i5 9400 f 60 fps on low native settings"
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 7 5800X, RX 6800, 32 GB RAM\n\nSettings ultra, native @ 1440p\n\nI'm running the game on Linux through Proton and get around 50-70 fps.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Rtx 3080 fe 10gb\n\n5800x3d\n\n32gb 3600mhz memory\n\n@1440p\n\nI get about 80-90fps in mission. I undervolt and my rig is water cooled so temps stay pretty controlled.\n\nSecond system with a 5800x non-3d but everything else the same gets 70-80fps in mission.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "RTX 4090, i9 13900k\n\nHitting 90-100ish FPS, maxed out, native 4K\n\n115-120 FPS, maxed out, ultra quality upscale\n\n120 locked, maxed out, quality upscale.\n\nGame looks beautiful on native, as well as ultra quality upscale. Dropping down to “quality” on the upscale introduces a lot of shimmering and the image breaks down.\n\nReally hoping they add DLSS3/FSR3 at some point. The current upscaler ain’t great. Anything below ultra quality really diminishes image fidelity far beyond what I’ve seen in DLSS3 supported games.\n\nEdit: New settings are: Native 4K, maxed graphics, capped at 120 FPS, but typically hovering in the 90-105 range in game, 120 locked on the ship. \n\nI recommend turning the FPS Limit to “Off” in the game settings and setting your cap in Nvidia control panel, or whatever your equivalent is. There’s a bug when using the cap setting in game which causes your CPU to run much hotter than it should."
},
{
"body": "I have a amd ryzen 9 5900x 12 core processor\n\nA RTX 4060 Ti and 32Gb ram\n\nwhen im on the ship i get about 115-135 fps but when in mission i get around 60-70. I feel it should be running better or am i wrong?"
},
{
"body": "Intel 13th Gen \nNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 \n\n\nI have been having a really bad experience with this game. I crash every few mins. I have tried to fix or correct a few things mentioned on youtube channels and on reddit forums, but nothing seems to be working. I was really suspicious of my system being the problem, but after doing bio changes and xmp profiles to changing power options on my pc and video card and much much more, I think its not my system but the game. I have never had to so much for a game.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I'm also having crashes. I've managed to mitigate it to 1 crash every 2 matches. But, I love managed democracy, so I immediately reload the game and jump right back in.\n\nFOR LIBERTY!",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "It's not your system... It's the game. It crashes my pc all the time when the server is overloaded, causing me to lose my damn mind trying to log back in with my buddies.",
"replies": [
{}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "i9 9900K, 32GB RAM and a RTX 4080 SUPER OC running at 1440x3440 getting about 100fps",
"replies": [
{
"body": "You're playing in portrait?"
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i5-12600k, 32GB DDR4, RTX 4080, 3440x1440.\n\nI play at native res with default preset of high and if I'm the only player in the game it'll sit around 120fps. With 3x other players it'll average around 100fps.\n\nDifference between Low settings and Max is about 20fps, and lowering the render resolution doesn't give me much performance boost so I just play at native."
},
{
"body": "Thinking of purchasing but wondering if anyone has any experience on a RTX 3070, R5 3600 and 16GB of 3600Mhz Ram?\n\nWould like to play at 60 FPS 1440P if possible.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "[deleted]",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "13900k, RTX 4090, 32GB RAM, 3440x1440p Alienware 3423DW w/ HDR. Ultra everything on Ultra Quality resolution. Usually get anywhere from 130-140 in big fights to 175 or so running around the map.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "1660 ti, Ryzen 5 2600, 16 GB RAM\n\nI run 1080p medium with native scaling and no v-sync and while I'm sure I'm averaging at only 40-50 fps, the game runs smooth enough and looks beautiful enough for my standards and is absolutely playable. No crashes or instances of instability so far so good. Also, the game automatically set quite a chunk of the graphic settings to 'high' by default and I never touched those."
},
{
"body": "Radeon RX 560x\nRyzen 5 2500U\n24GB RAM, 4GB VRAM\n\naverage fps is 15-20 in combat and when tons of freedom is dispersed I get 7\n\nP.S. I think my laptop is going to melt through my desk",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Nitro 5?",
"replies": [
{}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "R7 5700x (undervolted) \n3200 16CL 32Gb \n4070 Super\n\nMedium settings , like 60-70% CPU and 50-60% of GPU. I get 70-80 FPS on a mission with many trees etc. On moon maps its like 80-90. But every here and there FPS can drop to like \\~53 for a few seconds("
},
{
"body": "Im running rtx 4070 super, Intel Core i9-9900K, DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB gb Ram. I get like 40 fps i dont know wtf is going with my pc",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I'm running a 4070 super too but my CPU sucks compared to you. I have a ryzen 5 3600x and I'm bouncing around between 20 and 50 fps"
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Currently with a 5900x3d and a 4090. Play at 3440x1440 ultra and Getting around 130-165fps depending on what’s all going on at that moment. \n\nUpgrading to a 7800x3d Monday so curious if I’ll be able to squeeze out steady 144fps afterwards.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "good luck. in my opinion they just need to fix perfomance."
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "running it in a laptop at 1080p 144 \n\nRXT 3060 with Ryzen 7 5800h with 32GB of ram \n\nFPS is from high to mid 70s upwards on ultra quality with graphics at medium \n\ntends to take my fps to 3 to 4 when opening stratagems but apart from that runs very well",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "4090,5800x et j'atteins 140 fps dans le vaisseau...\nEn jeu en général je suis à 80 fps avec des graphisme modifies entre moyens et haut...c'est vraiment pas terrible en 3440x1440."
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 9 3900X\n\nRTX 4080\n\nGetting around 40-60 fps on the recommended settings from Geforce Experience."
},
{
"body": "im wondering if i should get it when my pc specs are \n\nProcessor\tAMD Ryzen 5 4600H with Radeon Graphics 3.00 GHz\n\nInstalled RAM\t8.00 GB (7.42 GB usable)\n\nDevice ID\tF371BCAB-F73A-41A0-B9DF-8DFD3C557D8B\n\nProduct ID\t00342-20971-80171-AAOEM\n\nSystem type\t64-bit operating system, x64-based processor\n\nit is a laptop that cant run mw3 multiplayer but i really want to play it and need to know if i will get below 30fps on default graphics if somebody can help",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "RTX 4080 (2745mhz, 95%), 7800X3D (4,8GHZ all core, 60-70%), 32GB RAM@6000CL36. \nOn Malevelon Creek level 6 difficulty. Native 1440p ultra settings. 90-115FPS average"
},
{
"body": "RTX 4080 gigabyte OC, 14900k and 64 gigs of 6400mhz (upped a bit to 6800mhz) Ram, LG C1 OLED\n\nFPS is 90-100 4k all at max settings\n\nCPU temp is 60-70c GPU 60-68c\n\nGame running great. No hiccups. No slow downs when a ton of enemies are on the screen. A far cry from when the game first released which was terrible. Now if they only fix the Social tab they have then the game would be perfect ( just not a good Social interface and friend inviting system and invites stay stuck in pending a lot). \n\nGood luck!",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "5800X3D/3060TI/32MB-3600MHZ: Ultra Quality/High most/Medium reflections and shadows/low fog and clouds = 70-100fps."
},
{
"body": "5600X / RX6800 16GB / 64GB DDR4 3600 CL16 / M.2 PCIE 4.0 SSD\n\n3440x1440 Ultrawide monitor at 144Hz\n\nSetting are custom but most are maxed out (tweaked some irrelevant visual settings) render at ultra.\n\nThe lowest I get is about 55 FPS, but mostly around 70 in mission and then 80 to 110 on the ship.\n\nCheers"
},
{
"body": "My current system is an R5-3600+RX-480 8gb, and it struggles to keep the game playable. I run native resolution at 2560x1080, all settings low and features disabled and get between 20-40fps.\nThis game prompted me to finally upgrade, and ordered a pre built with an R7-7800x3d and RTX-4070 super. Pretty excited to crank the graphics and get good frames",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "RTX 4080, i7-13700k, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, 2560x1440 144 Hz Monitor\n\nEverything Ultra on \"Native\": 130-140 FPS\n\nEverything Ultra on \"Supersampling\": 80-90 FPS\n\nEverything Ultra on \"Ultra Supersampling\" - 55-60 FPS\n\nAnd the game looks kinda washed out and mushy on native. For my personal preference it has to be at least Supersampling so the game looks good. But I have a 144 Hz monitor and want to make use of it so...I am kinda disappointed tbh.\n\nOn native the game looks kinda dated, on Supersampling it runs not that smooth on current high end rig."
},
{
"body": "RTX A5000 (Around 3080) Native 2560x1080 Vsync ON (100 Hz) Around 105-115 (I lock fps at 120)\nOnly at loading screen which launch pod is drop around 90 \n\n\nDOF ON / Bloom ON / Sharpness 0.75 / Texture Quality Ultra / Object Detail Ultra / Render Distance High / Shadow Med / Particle Med / Reflection Low / Space Low / Ambient ON / SSGI OFF/ Vegetation High / Terrain high / Volume Fog Low / Volume Cloud Low / Lighting Med / AA ON\n\n\n\n ..I lock it as driver level lazy to change."
},
{
"body": "RTX 4070ti, 11600k, 32gb cl18@3600\n\nRunning the game fully cranked at 1440p, no upscaler, I run around my ship at an average of 130, lows to 105.\n\n \nI average around 100 on planet but dips below 80 do happen from time to time in the thick of it. Definitely some room for improvement on the CPU\n\nCan OC from 4.6 to 4.9 and gain around 5-6% to all the numbers above, but largely not worth the extra heat.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Amd ryzen 5 2600\nAmd radeon rx 570\n32 gb ram\nPop os running game through proton on steam\nRuns about 60 fps on low to medium settings but progressively lowers in framerate the longer its running most likely a heat issue.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "I have a 6700xt red devil on the way, but right now I have a lender rx7600 w/ i5-9600k & 32gb ddr4 @ 1080p. Currently getting great performance(60-110fps) with High/medium settings on both native and ultra quality using Adrenaline's FSR with the native \"resolution\" at 1660. Not my video but this should help everyone understand the settings and their demand to their personal needs. \n\n\n[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtM4ffG\\_zko&ab\\_channel=BenchmarKing](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtM4ffG_zko&ab_channel=BenchmarKing)"
},
{
"body": "3060 RTX \nI7-9700k\n16 RAM\n\nAm I just better off buying it on PS5?"
},
{
"body": "Cant complain, around 80-90 ( 70 if its really crowded with enemies)\n\nIntel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900K4070 Super32GB RAM 3200 mhz 1440p (170 hz monitor)\n\n( ultra quality preset)"
},
{
"body": "can you guy suggest for me what setting good \nAMD Ryzern 5 5600H + RTX 3050ti + 16gb ram \n my setting in game is low but fps still 30-40 fps"
},
{
"body": "Currently playing on laptop 4070, 13th Gen Intel 14-Core i9-13900H, average 60 fps, when starting the mission on 240hz screen is around 120 fps but sometime drop to 30 when there's a lot of explosions. Problem is the cooler, often 80 C every time. Zephyrus m16"
},
{
"body": "i5 9600k with an RTX 4060 and 16gb RAM running off SSD. Getting 50-60fps but in big fights chugging around 35-38fps often. Changing graphics settings does very little (like 5fps difference at best). I even tried running at low settings with resolution scale set to performance and it did nothing. Led me to believe it's a CPU bottleneck, so I checked temps and I never go over 71C under intense load, which is totally acceptable and not throttling. I know 9600k isn't the fastest thing on the market, but it handles everything else I throw at it without a problem. Anyone with 9600k performance to mention?",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I have a 9600k with a 4070 Ti super (in the middle of upgrading). 16 GB of RAM as well, getting similar results to you. I'm running on medium and experiencing drops below 60 only during fights. Temps are good. I guess it's just our processor.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "Also a 9600k user here, with it overclocked to 4.7GHz and a RTX 3070ti. It's definitely the CPU bottlenecking. I'll watch performance specs while playing, and the CPU is constantly at full load, whereas the GPU is hitting 75-80% usage.",
"replies": [
{}
]
}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "1660ti, 6gb dedicated \n16gb ddr5 ram\n\ni7 9750H 2.6ghz",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "I7 4790k for CPU with 16GB of ram powered by 4080s. Max 90fps with supersampling and 3440 x 1440 resolution.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "1440p on High Settings ~120fps\n\ni9 12900k, 32 GB DDR5, RTX 3080, NVMe SSD, 1000w psu\n\nThis game is very cpu heavy\n\nupgrading to the i9 12900k and 32 gb ddr5 from a i7-9700f w/ 16gb ddr4 running the same 3080 i more than doubled my FPS. on low settings I was getting 60-70 before I upgraded"
},
{
"body": "Gtx 1060 \n\nIntel i7 8700k \n\nRuns ok, but I have no idea how to check fps....I'm new to PC gaming, normally play on Xbox. Looking for upgrades and considering 5700xt or 2060 Super. Any advice out there?",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Rtx 3080TI, Ryzen 9 5900x, 32G RAM@5600\n\nAverage maybe around 50-70 fps on Ultra settings. I think I may have a bottle neck or something as even though its not the greatest graphics card I feel like I should be hovering around 80-90 fps. Any ideas?",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i7-11370H, RTX 3060 and 16GB of RAM (Laptop)\n\n \nVery very bad performance, I can hardly get 40 FPS on a mission and only get a good 60 in the shuttle. I'm not quite sure what the problem is :/"
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 9 3900XT CPU, Radeon RX 6800XT GPU, and 32 GB of RAM, the sticks being 4 x 8GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo Series DDR4 RAM at 3600 MHz. In the ship I hover around 110fps, on planets I hover around 70-60fps however I can drop lower to around 50-40 fps depending on how many enemies are on the screen. I’m surprised considering my CPU isn’t new but not terrible, and my GPU is a pretty good card. I’m running at 1080p though, and my CPU/GPU aren’t near full usage at medium graphics settings."
},
{
"body": "i got RX 6600XT for gpu and cpu is AMD Ryzen 7 5700G \nRAM: 16GBs\n\nMostly get 60fps above but when im ship or dropping in a drop pod the frames drop down to 15fps idk why tbh",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Old thread but my i7 8700k is tanking my 3080 so hard in this game. No matter the settings I drop to 50’s and high 40’s on graphically intensive planets. Averaging 65-80. 4k balanced with mix of high and medium. 1440p balanced yields same performance just with less gpu usage. I have a 12700k and new mobo but just putting off having someone swap the parts out and I’ll afraid I’ll break it doing it myself lol"
},
{
"body": "980, 5600G and 32GB of DDR4 and it runs at about 60 FPS on 1080p ultra quality upscaling"
},
{
"body": "I7-4790, 16 gb RAM, GTX 980ti. Running game at lowest settings @ 1440p with scaler set to balanced. Getting a solid 50+ FPS with some dips into the mid 40s. Overall can't complain with a 10 year old gaming rig"
},
{
"body": "I'm using 5700xt gpu with 5800x3d 32gb ram\nI get 45 fps avg on 1440p on lowest setting \nEven 1080 on high looks nothing like 2k motionir on low.\ngonna need a new gpu pretty soon."
},
{
"body": "i9-13900H\\\n32GB RAM\\\nRTX 3050 4GB\\\n\nEverything low\n\n1080p @ 10-50 fps (FSR - \"quality\", 2 steps below native)"
},
{
"body": "Running a i7 6950x 32GB Quad channel ram 3000 MHZ and an Nvidia 3090\n\nI have a 4k 60hz monitor so I got some wiggle room.\n\nUsually run at 60 FPS. I cap it though so it could go higher."
},
{
"body": "What is the minimum I need to run helldivers even I want to join the fight but don't have money for a ps5 and my cousin just gave me his old ps the specs are horrible tho I haven't even started yet all I know is it has a 9600 geforce gt 1.5 gb of ssd a asus motherboard that is massive and don't knownthe ram or cpu😭😭 edit: I don't think I could convince my parents to buy my anything crazy so I'm just looking for the bare minimum",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Rx 7900 xt\nRyzen 7 7700x\nDdr5 32gb 6000 cl30\n\nGet around 90 to 100 fps on ultra 1440p"
},
{
"body": "6700 XT, Ryzen 5 5600, 32gb DDR4 RamRunning on a 1080p 165 hz monitor\n\nI have some custom settings (I found a Youtube video that went through all the settings and what they did and the best settings etc...) but I have most things on high-ultra, and I sit around 125 fps in my ship and around 70-80 on dives. If I want more frames I can run it in ultra quality rather than native but I do notice a slight dip in quality so I tend to stick to native and take a few less frames. Freesync makes it so I can't even tell.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "I have a gtx 780 ti. Can that handle helldivers 2?",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i9-12900k, RTX 4090, 64 DDR5, at 4k Native. About 60fps.\nI’m thinking of upgrading to i9-14900k to be able to push it to Supersampling as the fog and lighting in this game is beautiful.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "A cpu upgrade will not help with supersampling, supersampling hits gpu.\n\nWhat you could do to keep up with the performance hit of supersampling is use frame gen from the program called Lossless scaling. I personally do native 4k 120hz HDR with a 5800x3d and rtx 3090 thanks to that program's frame gen, I would do 4k60 without it.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "That’s definitely something I will look into. thank you v much sir 👍"
}
]
},
{}
]
},
{
"body": "ryzen 5 5600x \n\nrx 7600xt\n\nsetting is native no upscale on middle setting \n\n4 ram 3000hrz \n\n\nfps is from 48-76\n\n1080p 165hrz \n\n \nneed help with why it runs awful only on this game",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "6750xt 5800x 1440p ultra settings getting 70 - 80 fps not using afmf which honestly gave me 50 more fps but caused fps drops and stutters looking left and right."
},
{
"body": "RTX 3070 \nRyzen 7 5800x3d \n32gb of ram \n1440p \n\n\nI get about 50-68\\~ fps on average, usually doesnt go far below 60 unless everyone calls in orbitals at the same time. Perfectly playable and fun. I run high settings, native res."
},
{
"body": "7800x3d, rx7800xt, 32gb ram 5600cl40\n\nmonitor 1440p 165hz\n\nupscale ultra, max settings, 80fps in game \n\nnative with hyperrx enabled (amd fps boost) & max settings 140fps in game"
},
{
"body": "4070 SuperTI - i5-14600K - 32GB 3200mhz RAM\n\nTodo Ultra - 1080 - Supersampling\n\n75 fps muy estables"
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 7 5700g 16 ddr4 3200 3060 12g On a 65 inch tclb4k uhd\nI'm on ultra settings with 4k resolution getting 60 to 100 fps "
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 9 - 5950x, \n32gb - 3600 - CL16 ram, \n980 pro ssd, \n3080 OC by tuf,\n\nPlay on 1440p widescreen 34 inch \n\nI get roughly 85 fps with some dips to 75ish \nDlss quality mode and optimised graphic settings."
},
{
"body": "Settings are Low for performance, haven't changed anything since release. Sorta brag in the opposite direction from Sino, lol\n\ni7 4790k at stock settings, 3060ti, 32GB RAM @ 1333MHz\n\nMonitor is 1440p@144Hz \ngetting *just* about 60-70fps \n\nmy lows are about 35fps occasionally but that's when it gets a bit spicy and just encourages me to clear out patrols quicker lol\n\nIt's very playable as I usually play at the highest levels (difficulty 7-9) and use quite difficult loadouts (e.g. anti-material rifle to take down Hulks/Devastators), so its safe to say I can get some pretty good accuracy.\n\nI am looking to upgrade this year, but v happy with this capable 10 year old CPU."
},
{
"body": "4k max graphics average fps 30 that's with 4090 13700k"
},
{
"body": "i7 9700K with 7900XTX @1440p,\nNative scaling and mostly max settings\nBloom and Global illumination off, shadows low.\n\n\n86FPS - 110FPS\n\n\n\n\nBefore the driver patch for the crashing 7900XTX on this game, I swapped in an RX580 4GB, just so I could play stable.\n\n\ni7 9700K with RX 580 4GB Sapphire @ 1440p,\nMix of mostly medium with some low settings. Bloom and Global illumination off\n\n\n35FPS - 47FPS\n\n\nUpgrading to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, and a X670-E mobo, parts arrived today. Will update after built."
},
{
"body": "mi pc: \n4090 \ni9 14900KF\n\n32 GB RAM DDR5 6000 MHZ\n\nTODO FULL\n\nEl juego anda perfecto, pero los ventiladores de la gpu girando van, girando van. \n(se calienta bastante el pc, al punto que me da miedo jugar con esa calidad)"
},
{
"body": "I have a TUF Gaming B550M-Wifi Plus, Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Trident Z Neo DDR4 3600 and AMD RX 7900 XTX.\nMax Settings i get 85-92 FPS at 1440P"
},
{
"body": "I7 8700, gtx 1660, 1440p, scaling on ultra, all set on low, anti aliasing on, and around 60-70 fps"
},
{
"body": "rtx 3060 laptop with a ryzen 7 5800h. the performance is pretty tough and i get about 40-60 fps when i should be getting a lot more.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "CPU : Ryzen 7 5700G OC'd 4.75GHz, with PBO @23-27 across cores\nGPU : 3060 Asus LHR OC'd to safest max\nRAM quad channel : 4x8GB single rank tight timmings base 2400Mhz xmp @3600 OC'd to 3800MHz\nStorage : M.2 980 Evo 1TB \nCase : NZXT H5 Flow\nCPU cooler : Arctic 35A?\nChassis fans : modified chinesse rgb fans, they have higher rpm now\n\nMonitor : 23.8 Inch 1920x1080 @165Hz\n\n\nDoing some custom settings with native\nFirst launch had 50-60fps\nFirst update had 60fps in ship\n\nNow I'm at 90-98 in ship\nAnd 67-78 in game regardless of mob numbers\nExplosions are the only ones that reduce the fps\nAnd it does not drop under 59 or something\n\nTemps are okay as far as i've seen 59°C to 65°C cpu and gpu doesn't go above 70°C\n\nCPU usage goes from 30% to 55%\nGPU stays 100%\n\n\nHope this helps?"
},
{
"body": "rtx 2080 super \nryzen 5 5600g slightly overclocked \n32gb ram \nultra gets around 80-90 fps (almost every preset does tho, not sure why)"
},
{
"body": "7900XTX (undervolted and underclocked), 10700K, 64gb ddr4\n\nAt 4K native res, I'm getting 65-80 fps at ultra settings (everything maxed). 65 fps minimum during missions and a steady 79 fps on ship. If I turn frame gen on or lower the native rendering it goes to 130 fps but doesn't really look that much better. As long as I am over 60 fps in 4k native resolution I'm happy which my PC is able to reach.\n\nGame looks pretty good, not amazing. It's quite demanding honestly for what it is, about as demanding as Starfield which gets around the same fps.\n\nI don't really monitor my CPU temps but maybe I should after reading some of these other comments."
},
{
"body": "4090 \n7700X \n16GB DDR5 6000 \n4TB PCIe 4.0 NVME\n\n4K Ultra @ 120Hz, Ultra Quality Upscaling. 130-140 FPS avg during battle. 115-125 if I set scaling to Native, but I actually prefer Ultra for the anti-aliasing effect it has from being a slightly lower resolution. Not a fan of how native 4K looks now that I'm used to DLSS. I wish this game had support for it."
},
{
"body": "Alienware M16 R1.\n4080 i9 13900 32 RAM\n\nGetting 75-80fps, everything maxed out",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 5 3600, 16 gb ram 3734mhz and a 3060 ti oc. \n\nI run 1440p with a mix between high and low settings on DX 11. \n\nRunning around 60 fps, sometimes 70 fps, drops into 40 fps if a large fight is happening. Dropped to 30 almost at points so lowered a few settings. \n\nIt stays above 45 fps mostly now in big fights. \n\nOn the smaller missions the fps doesn't drop so much. I hope dlss comes soon or a big optimization patch."
},
{
"body": "i7 6700k\n1060 6GB\n1080p\n\nI play on low settings and get 45-55FPS however when there’s a lot of stuff going around fps drops to an unplayable 20 or sometimes lower. \n\nGame isn’t optimized, but i’m not worrying too much as I’ll be upgrading to a new rig very soon.",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "4060 ti + 13700k + 32gb DDR5 6400 & a 34\" 1440 ultra wide... the game runs beautifully on my setup, settings maxed out with ultra quality render selected. Love this game!"
},
{
"body": "7800x3d/4080 combo. I prefer stability and fidelity over frames. So I do 90 fps locked @ 1440p max settings. Native resolution option. Runs smooth as butter and looks gorgeous."
},
{
"body": "I have a Ryzen 5 5500 CPU, with a AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT GPU, and 40 GB of RAM. Would I be able to run this game? Anyone could help direct me to bench testing websites",
"replies": [
{
"body": "I got the same cpu with a RTX 2060S, 16G ram. Works flawlessly for me.",
"replies": [
{
"body": "After running some AMD features I have a quality I’m good with and it runs flawless as well. I won’t ever have High quality but it’s more than enough, I’m not paying attention to the small pebbles on the ground WHEN DEMOCRACY IS AT STAKE. HELLDIVERS PUSH THROUGH 😤 🫡 GOD BLESS SUPER EARTH"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"body": "core i9900, 32GB RAM ddr4, nvidia 4060\n\nen un monitor full hd a 60 fps estables"
},
{
"body": "https://preview.redd.it/nmq4r2d9rmqc1.png?width=271&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd99ab6ce52e586421cd63e59d808284669e6225\n\n I have this PC and I feel that some configuration is wrong because when playing Helldiver 2 I don't go above 60fps and my friend has practically the same PC and according to how they configured his Windows and now everything runs at 100fps at least >.>.\n Can someone help me configure?"
},
{
"body": "I've been playing helldivers 2 on a laptop with an i5 8250U with 20gb of ram. The game looks horrible and gives me incredible amounts of fog to the point the tutorial mission has fog, but it's playable. I still get to have fun spreading democracy."
},
{
"body": "Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Ti \nIntel i7+10870H CPU 2.20GHz\n\nused to be able to run the game flawlessly but its a laggy mess after Patch 1.000.103 (even on the lowest settings) \nand I have installed the latest patch + latest Driver update but the problem still persistes"
},
{
"body": "Bottleneck: \n**i5 6600K**, overclocked to 4.2GHz (at stock it's 3.5-3.9GHz).\n\nLots of RAM. GPU is too fast for this setup, so I won't mention it.\n\nLow detail (slightly above), at 1440p or 4K, can't remember (the res doesn't matter, as the GPU is fast enough).\n\nGetting **30-60 fps**, depending on map and number of units. With **stutter** when something loads etc. I can often tell if something is coming behind the corner 😄 \n\n\nThe CPU works at 100% usage at all times. I'd say this CPU is rightfully below the minimum spec. But the game is very playable. Just not very pleasant."
},
{
"body": "Vega 56 flashed to 64 on water, Ryzen 5 5600X (on water too), 32GB of 4000Mhz RAM.\n\nI play at 3440x1440 but only getting \\~28FPS..... I need to adjust settings. I honestly was having so much fun I did not realize my FPS was so bad..."
},
{
"body": "8086K @ 5Ghz and 4070 Super (also overclocked), 32GB of 3000Mhz CL15 RAM\n\nPlaying at native res on a 1440p 165hz monitor, Ultra settings\n\nI'm getting around 100fps most of the time."
},
{
"body": "I play this game on Linux, I'm not sure how much this matters. \n7800X3D, 6950XT@2600mhz -25mv , 32GB@CL6000, game is installed on a SATA SSD drive.\n\nI play at 4K with everything maxed out, and I need to set upscaling from native to ultra quality to hold 60FPS."
},
{
"body": "4090 \n7950x3d \n64gb of ram 6200mhz\nIt runs 100fps 4K 1% lows 85fps"
},
{
"body": "Can I run Helldivers 2 with ryzen 7 5700g with 16 gb 3200mhz ddr4 without GPu?",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "i7-12700k 4070 ti super 32gb/s@3000 CL 18, 135-140fps on ship 120 on missions 1-4 and i get from 90 to 60fps on 7 or above missions. all ultra, native, anti is off."
},
{
"body": "Ryzen 5 5500, RTX 2060S, 16G ram\n\nMy rig isn't a heavy hitter like most, but I get about 60 fps.\n\nhttps://preview.redd.it/na3eyv155frc1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=5ddfee7583f406ce2873e22f0e11b448e27a9f85",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "Radeon RX 7700 XT, Ryzen 5 5600x, 32GB RAM DDR4-3600 CL18\n\nMonitor 1080p 75hz\n\nMedium graphics\n\nFPS 30-40"
},
{
"body": "4070 \nRyzen 7 3700x \n32 gigs ram \nNative res everything maxed 1440p I get around 100fps in my ship and 50-80 in game when average around 65-70fps"
},
{
"body": "I5 13600k, 6700xt, 32Gb ram, 34\"ultrawide QHD monitor\n I run everything on ultra/high, quality set to Native but reduce the resolution from 3440x1440 to 2560×1080\n averaging 55-70fps in battle."
},
{
"body": "7800x3d, b650, xfx merc 7900xt, 32gb 6000mt/s cl36, 850w platinum PSU. \n\n32\" 1440p 165hz Samsung G5 or 32\" 1440p 175hz LG ultra gear. \n\nMaxed out settings getting 130fps."
},
{
"body": "what would be the cheapest setup to run the game at not less than 150fps on Ultra at 1080?"
},
{
"body": "https://preview.redd.it/cjncd6rc02sc1.png?width=456&format=png&auto=webp&s=37c63f8ea29679c28d7fcecc703e34b5a4564e9e\n\n\n\nRunning with this spec and low-high settings but cant get more fps then 50-60? Anyone knows why i cant reach more fps?"
},
{
"body": "Phenom 2 8350, RTX 3060\n 16GB DDR3\nSSD 1 TERA\n\nWho did I ask, yes, the game runs smoothly"
},
{
"body": "ryzen 5 5600x, 32gb 3200hz ram, rx 6750xt, 2560x1080p ultrawide monitor at 180hz\n\nI play on medium preset for better fps, average 80-130"
},
{
"body": "core i5 9400F - GTX 1650 - 16 gb de ram, y cuando recién inicia el juego en el puente tengo una caída de fps a 10 y ya en juego a veces juego a 30 pero tengo caídas de fps a 14, no se que está mal"
},
{
"body": "i7 4770k oc'ed to 4.5ghz \n32gb ddr4 ram \nmsi gaming 5 mobo \n1tb ssd \ngtx3070\n\nmax settings at 1440p anywhere from 30fps-80fps\n\n\\[i should really get the 7800x3d huh?\\]"
},
{
"body": "i7-4790k @ 4.5ghz, 16 gb 1600 mhz ddr3, RX 6600\n\nSettings is a mix of medium/high, 1080p\n\nMostly getting 60ish FPS, in some intense situations the CPU craps out and FPS falls to 40ish FPS. But still quite an impressive showing from this ancient CPU IMHO :-) an extremely playable experience\n\nHave played around one month, ZERO crashes\n\n\n—-\n\nALSO:\n\nIve tried the game on an i5-6600k with DDR4 ram, at stocks speeds it was absolutely horrible. Overclocked to 4.5ghz its playable but still, in intense situations, worse (like 25% worse) than my trusty old 4th gen i7.\n\nIn other words: i dont recommend this game on a 4 core/4 threads CPU unless they optimize it better for that…"
},
{
"body": "En altos promedio 66 cuadros con bajones a 30 \nr9 5900x utilización 80%\nRx 7700xt utilización 60%"
},
{
"body": "13th gen i7-13700H, 32gb ram, rtx a500, laptop, 30fps on lowest settings, dropping to 3fps every 3-5 seconds"
},
{
"body": "radeon rx550"
},
{
"body": "RTX 4070ti, Ryzen 5 7600x \nI can run the game fine at max graphics and ultra quality. \nmy friend who has a slightly \"worse\" gpu (according to the benchmark test), a 3090, can run ultra supersampling, but I can barely do so.\n\nmaybe I'm being greedy, but can anyone help explain how the HELL he's doing this?"
},
{
"body": "post 01.000.202 patch\n\ni5-12400f rx 6800 (non xt) 16gb 3200mhz\n\nim getting around 80-90 fps on average @ 1080p native with high preset. would drop down to the 40s when things go boom on helldive\n\ni checked on 3dmark and cinebench and my desktop is performing as expected, anyone else getting horrible performance even with rig above the recommended one?",
"replies": [
{}
]
},
{
"body": "3700x, RTX 2070 & 48GB ram\n\nHave everything on low except Ultra on Textures\n\nRunning around 50-80 with around 70fps avg"
},
{
"body": "im running a 3800x oced to 4.2 ish ghz with a 3070ti and 32 gigs or ram running at the 3200mhz. i seem to run close to 70 most the time but towards the end of missions i drop to 40s and sometimes lower with all the stuff spawning i play mostly all settings ultra besides render distance is anyone getting such a harsh drop like that or is there something wrong with my pc?"
},
{
"body": "Rtx 4070 ti\nRyzen 5800x\n1440p monitor with 144 Hz refresh rate\n\nFPS is 100+ on ship. 60s to somewhere between either 70s or 80s, with some occasional dips to the 50s on ground."
},
{
"body": "I'm with a 7800x3d and 4070tis, I'm having around 125fps on ultra profile at 1080 native rendering (average) and trying to find out video configs that allow me to get stable 144fps. What you guys recommend me to tweak in order to get these e tra fps w/o gaming look ugly? I mean, removal of fog is ok; decreasing on the rendering quality is not ok. I'm fine with removing certain stuff from the game but I'm not fine with keeping thing in it but making it looking noticeably uglier. "
},
{
"body": "i57500, gtx 1060 oc 3gb, 16gb ddr4 \nI got around 20-30 fps on ultra low ;) \nDemocracy dont know eye pain <3"
},
{
"body": "I9 9900K, GTX 1080 ti, 32GB RAM @ 1440p\n\nEverything on low, full resolution\n\nI get 80-90 fps silent situations and \\~60 fps in stressful situations"
},
{
"body": "I have a 2080 super with a ryzen 5 5600g and somehow I get 80-90 fps on all ultra settings, same fps on all settings tho so I just use ultra"
},
{
"body": "RTX 3080TI with Ryzen 7 5800x 16gb RAM\nlows of 57fps planetside not sure why this is performing around d the same as my rtx 2080 super and I9-9900K 32gb RAM PC weird "
},
{
"body": "RTX 4060 TI 16GB and i5 14600KF\nUltra settings \n4k 30 fps\n@1440 60-70 fps"
},
{
"body": " I get about 30fps with low to medium settings on everything most of the time, lows are around 23. \n\nIm running it on the worst setup here in my gaming laptop… RTX 3050ti with a Ryzen 7 5800H. 16gb ram - although my system says it’s only 14gb :(\n\nCurious what an RX7700XT with a Ryzen 7 7800X3D would do… I’m looking to build a PC soon just to play HD2 properly!"
},
{
"body": "rtx 4060 ti 8gb\n\ni9-9900k\n\n32gb\n\nruns at 50-60fps at 4k, \"high\" graphics, \"quality\" render scale. feels like a good balance. looks fine"
},
{
"body": "Quiero comprar el juego por Steam, me podrían decir si valdrá la pena jugarlo en mi laptop? muchas gracias!!\n\n12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-12700H 2.70 GHz RAM 16.0 GB NVIDIA RTX 3070 (AORUS 5 )"
},
{
"body": "Laptop Acer Nitro 5 - RX560X, Rysen 5 - 3550H, RAM 16 GB, 1080P@144Hz \nLow Everything (but render to Balance) and Force Game Use DX11 \nFPS is 30-90 FPS after clear shader cache (if use Dx12 10-30 FPS)\n\nKEY is change to DX11"
},
{}
]
}